Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 477
Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al
as 23-7154
Plaintiff / Appellee: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellee: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Alsip, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Illinois Leasing and others
Defendant / Appellant: M & K Quality Truck Sales of Alsip, LLC, M & K Quality Truck Sales of Joliet, LLC, M & K Quality Truck Sales of Northern Illinois, LLC and others
Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al
as 23-7149
Plaintiff / Appellee: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellant: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Alsip, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Illinois Leasing and others
Defendant / Appellee: XYZ Corporations 1-10, John and Jane Does 1-10, M & K Quality Truck Sales of Alsip, LLC and others
Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al
as 23-7150
Plaintiff / Appellee: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellee: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Alsip, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Illinois Leasing and others
Defendant / Appellant: Chad Boucher and Jodi Boucher
Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al
as 23-7153
Plaintiff / Appellee: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
Defendant / Appellee: M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Alsip, M & K Employee Solutions, LLC-Illinois Leasing and others
Defendant / Appellant: M & K Employee Services, Inc.
HILDEBRANDT et al v. SIPARADIGM LLC et al
as 2:2023cv21835
Plaintiff: ERIC HILDEBRANDT, PAUL CHRISTIAN BURK, LAINA DUTTON and others
Defendant: SIPARADIGM LLC, HEALTH LYNKS, LLC., MOHAMMED KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Middleton v. Amentum Government Services Parent Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02456
Plaintiff: Jay Middleton
Defendant: Amentum Government Services Parent Holdings, LLC, Amentum Benefits Administration Committee, Tammy Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Tanika Parker, et al v. Tenneco, Inc., et al
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee: TANIKA PARKER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: TENNECO, INC., DRIV AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant: DOES, 1-30, John and Jane Doe Defendants
UFCW Local 174 Pension Fund v. Orazio & Sons Meats, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06806
Plaintiff: UFCW Local 174 Pension Fund
Defendant: Orazio & Sons Meats, Inc., XYZ Corporations 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Retail Food Store Employees Union Local 342 Pension Fund v. Jaypeejay Foods Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05627
Plaintiff: The Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Retail Food Store Employees Union Local 342 Pension Fund
Defendant: Jaypeejay Foods Inc., Jaypeejay Foods Inc. doing business as Golden Key Food Stores, Inc., Jaypeejay Foods Inc. doing business as Super G Foods Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Leather Goods, Plastics, Handbags and Novelty Workers' Union Local 1, Joint Retirement Fund v. Sibeau Handbags, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06423
Plaintiff: Leather Goods, Plastics, Handbags and Novelty Workers' Union Local 1, Joint Retirement Fund
Defendant: Sibeau Handbags, Inc., XYZ Corporations 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?