Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45018
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Quincy v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45008
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Quincy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chelan County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46139
Plaintiff:
Chelan County
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Walla Walla County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46010
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Walla Walla County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whitman County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op46009
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 100, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Whitman County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
