Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Diogu v. Lakeland West Capital 41, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03299
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Diogu Kalu Diogu II, LL.M., Diogu Kalu Diogu II Next Friend of DKKDIII and others
Defendant:
Next Friend of Minor Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Lakeland West Capital 41, LLC, Adam MCKEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 6:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Richard Brown, Officer Lawrence Robles, Shana Opela and others
Plaintiff:
John W Harrington and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peterson v. Peterson et al
as 4:2018cv04837
Defendant:
James R Morton, Serco USA Inc., Donald Jonathan Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Kathryn Peterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chism v. Law Offices of Vincent J. Buzek, et al
as 4:2016cv03627
Plaintiff:
Stacey Chism
Defendant:
Law Offices of Vincent J. Buzek, Vincent J Buzek and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 Through 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chism et al v. Continental Collection Agency Ltd. et al
as 4:2016cv03343
Plaintiff:
Jason Chism and Stacey Chism
Defendant:
Continental Collection Agency Ltd. , Nathan M. Twedt and John and Jane Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
