Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Schottenstein, M.D. et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv01197
Plaintiff:
Dr. Douglas Schottenstein, M.D., Thompson Real Estate, LLC, Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC d/b/a NY Spine Medicine and others
Defendant:
Derek Lee, Pearl Chan, Kong H Chan and others
Counter Defendant:
Schottenstein Pain and Neuro, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Leopard Solutions, LLC v. Legalist, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10264
Plaintiff:
Leopard Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Legalist, Inc., Murray Love, John or Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barber v. United States of America et. al.
as 2:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Nova Barber
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, John and Jane Does 1-10, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
