Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stanley et al v. California, State of et al
as 3:2012mc00100
Petitioner:
Zachary Stanley and Mark Edward
Respondent:
California, State of, Bonnie Michelle Dumanis and John and Jane Does 1-100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Supler v. ARS National Services, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01233
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W Supler
Defendant:
ARS National Services, Inc and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Koby et al v. ARS National Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Michael P Koby, Michael Simmons and Jonathan W Supler
Defendant:
ARS National Services, Inc. and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gardner et al v. ARS National Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02055
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Gardner, Jr. and Robert H. Gardner, Sr.
Defendant:
ARS National Services, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brown v. Credit Solutions Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Brown
Defendant:
Credit Solutions Corp., Credit Solutions Corp. and John and Jane Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
