Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Moore v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv05622
Plaintiff:
John Edward Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv04483
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bivens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
John Randall Bivens, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hixson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01326
Plaintiff:
John Hixson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McElhenney v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Henry McElhenney, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Andrew Saul
as 1:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. Andrew Saul
as 1:2020cv04988
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
John Kevin King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Berry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
John Berry
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Merck v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John Diedrich Merck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bivens v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv04243
Plaintiff:
John Randall Bivens, III
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
