Cases 1 - 10 of 430
Vescovi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Vescovi
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amato v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Robert John Amato
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogofsky v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Rogofsky
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Polowy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jeffery John Polowy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonald v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06183
Plaintiff:
John R McDonald
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Susino v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
John Michael Susino
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lumpkin, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06073
Plaintiff:
John Lumpkin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Manago v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv09001
Plaintiff:
John Richard Manago
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
