Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Mak v. Dunham et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Paul T Mak
Defendant:
Theodore R Dunham, John Does 1-10 and Theodore R Dunham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hamlin v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
John Paul Hamlin
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Castro v. Ziriax et al
as 5:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Paul Ziriax and Donald John Trump
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sam v. BancFirst et al
as 5:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Ellijah Sam
Defendant:
BancFirst and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Shuler v. U.S. Small Business Administration
as 5:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Tyler John Shuler
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horton v. Garland
as 5:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Skurkey v. Daniel et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
John V Skurkey
Defendant:
William Daniel, Paul E Quigley and Anne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Horton v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Federal Personnel Records Center and National Guard Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ferrell et al v. Deere & Co
as 5:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Monty Ferrell
Defendant:
Deere & Co doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
