Cases 31 - 40 of 616
PHILLIPS et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67639
Plaintiff:
RUBY MAE PHILLIPS and VALDOIE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIOTT et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67648
Plaintiff:
CLEO M ELLIOTT and THOMAS ELLIOTT
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBGOOD v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67406
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN HOBGOOD
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67637
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. CARTER
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. , JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVESON, JR. v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67608
Plaintiff:
EMMETT S. STEVESON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTGOMERY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67484
Plaintiff:
LOIS P. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDING v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67624
Plaintiff:
ESMOND H. HARDING
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LLEWELLYN v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67640
Plaintiff:
R. RODNEY LLEWELLYN
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLIS v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67407
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. KELLIS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67642
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. LONG and CLARA LONG
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
