Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Exposito v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Marie Jeanne Exposito
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02751
Plaintiff:
Linda B. Ryan
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01937
Plaintiff:
Shirley Carnella Carroll and J C Carroll
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon Inc and Boston Scientific Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Napoli v. Johnson & Johnson, INC.
as 3:2011cv00754
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, INC.
Plaintiff:
Dean Napoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Taylor v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01894
Plaintiff:
Charlene Logan Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
Susan C Hayes and Leonard Hayes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrow et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01866
Plaintiff:
Tina Morrow and Kenneth Morrow
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
Terrie S Gregory and Ralph R Gregory, Jr
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matherne v. Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01881
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy T. Matherne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Touro Infirmary et al
as 2:2011cv01586
Plaintiff:
James Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Touro Infirmary, Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
