Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hopkins v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2022cv03336
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Nielsen Holdings plc, James A. Attwood, Jr., David Kenny and others
Justice, II v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2022cv03338
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
Nielsen Holdings plc, James A. Attwood, Jr., David Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Gonzales v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2022cv03241
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Gonzales
Defendant:
Nielsen Holdings plc, James A. Attwood, Jr., David Kenny and others
Kuhn v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2022cv04352
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kuhn
Defendant:
Nielsen Holdings plc, James A. Attwood, Jr., David Kenny and others
O'Dell v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2022cv04340
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Nielsen Holdings plc, James A. Attwood, Jr., David Kenny and others
Brem Moldovsky, L.L.C. et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv02452
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Esquire Alexander Fink
Defendant:
Andrew Ellner, Lightbox Ventures, LLC, Lightbox Capital Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Esq. Brem Moldovsky, Brem Moldovsky, L.L.C. and Brem Moldovsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2021cv00374
Defendant:
David Rawlinson, Karen M. Hoguet, James A. Attwood, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anderson
Oram v. Nielsen Holdings plc et al
as 1:2020cv10893
Defendant:
David Rawlinson, Karen M. Hoguet, James A. Attwood, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Oram
Miller v. Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv11669
Defendant:
Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Rex Bright, Stanley Hirsch and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Miller
Joseph v. Rozell et al
as 6:2015cv06530
Plaintiff:
Jamont Joseph
Defendant:
Edward Rozell, Clifton J. Adriance, Roger G. Holly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
