Cases 31 - 40 of 56
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv01855
Plaintiff:
DEWANA JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2018cv01577
Defendant:
WMATA and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv00721
Plaintiff:
JOAN JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv00420
Plaintiff:
LINDA JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv02649
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv02212
Plaintiff:
MARY JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv01516
Plaintiff:
MARY JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. , PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01496
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2016cv01896
Plaintiff:
LUKE A. JONES, SR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00300
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
EARMITT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
