Cases 31 - 40 of 140
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMIREZ v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALFONSO SOLARES RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISH, TIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FELDER v. LEGGETT et al
as 1:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MARKELL FELDER
Defendant:
ISIAL LEGGETT, M. JONES, TIMOTHY BETTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
LACY EDWARD LEWIS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, GARY JONES, STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. USA
as 1:2016cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSEPH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. USA
as 1:2016cv01202
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LAMONT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. HOLT
as 1:2016cv01087
Petitioner:
DAVID EARL JONES
Defendant:
RONNIE HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. STATE OF MARYLAND
as 1:2016cv00832
Petitioner:
STACEY JONES
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5012
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
