Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Han v. Mcallenan, et al.
as 2:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Kevin Mcallenan, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security and others
Pemberton v. Cross et al
as 1:2017cv05994
Petitioner:
George Pemberton
Respondent:
Cross, Andrew Cuomo, Andrea W. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07694
Petitioner:
Sanders Lamar C. Adams
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York, Joseph Ponte and Warden of Rikers Island C-73 (GMDC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeil v. Warden AMKC et al
as 1:2015cv00239
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
Warden A.M.K.C., New York City Rikers Island AMKC, Department of Corrections (N.Y.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeil v. Warden AMKC et al
as 1:2014cv07110
Respondent:
Department of Corrections (N.Y.C.), New York City Rikers Island AMKC, Joseph Ponte and others
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McNeil v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv09735
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
New York City, John Doe and Joseph Ponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Johnson v. Kron et al
as 1:2014cv01377
Petitioner:
Rohan Johnson
Respondent:
Barry Kron, Gloria Pellegrino, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNeil v. New York City et al
as 1:2014cv08779
Petitioner:
Babu J. McNeil
Respondent:
New York City, John Doe, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruffin v. Ponte
as 1:2014cv06301
Petitioner:
Elvie Ruffin
Respondent:
Joseph Ponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Townsend et al v. Gubbay et al
as 1:2014cv03846
Respondent:
Michael Cheesa, Joseph E. Gubbay and Joseph Ponte
Petitioner:
John Vidurek Next Friend and Cory Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
