Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Short v. Caple et al
as 1:2013cv01889
Petitioner:
Lakisha Short
Respondent:
Wendi Caple and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Delaware State Police et al
as 1:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
Jamarr L. Campbell
Defendant:
Delaware State Police, Larry Smith, Adam Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv01401
Petitioner:
Cyril D. McCray
Respondent:
Philip Morgan and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shockley v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00457
Petitioner:
Sylvester Shockley
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, State Of Delaware and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brokenbrough v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00451
Petitioner:
Rory Brokenbrough
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00395
Petitioner:
Joseph T. Smith
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mendez v. Calderon, et al.
as 1:2013cv00173
Defendant:
Felipe Calderon, Lieutenant Governor of Delaware, Jeffrey Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00140
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bohan v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01025
Petitioner:
Charles Patrick Bohan, III
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Joseph R. Biden, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Biden et al
as 1:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alan T. Brooks
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, III, Charles F. Butler and Timothy A. Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
