Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ramirez et al v. E.N. Home Improvement Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ramirez and Juan De la Rosa
Defendant:
E.N. Home Improvement Inc., ASF Construction & Excavation Corp., Carlos Arevalo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
DE LA ROSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08944
Plaintiff:
JUAN DE LA ROSA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LA ROSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02024
Plaintiff:
JUAN DE LA ROSA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LA ROSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01813
Plaintiff:
JUAN DE LA ROSA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LA ROSA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05314
Plaintiff:
JUAN DE LA ROSA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Juan De la Rosa-Trinidad v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71147
Petitioner:
JUAN DE LA ROSA-TRINIDAD, AKA Aldolfo Delarosa
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
De La Rosa Romero et al v. Stratford Dry Cleaners et al
as 3:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
Juan De La Rosa Romero and Raul Lopez Ramirez
Defendant:
Stratford Dry Cleaners and Jeff Wi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
