Cases 1 - 7 of 7
USA v. Juan Perez-Maldonado
as 16-15616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN PEREZ-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Juan Perez
Juan Perez-Pablo, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-12253
Petitioner:
JUAN PEREZ-PABLO, TOMASA CALMO-CARRILLO, ROLANDO PEREZ-CALMO and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Levi Medina v. Secretary, Department of Corre
as 16-10332
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEVI JESSIE MEDINA, a.k.a. Juan Perez
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Antonio Carrizosa, et al v. CQB, et al
as 13-11047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA TEREZA MOSQUERA HURTADO, MAGNOLIA TRUJILLO, BLANCA ASENTH RESTREPO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA FRESH NORTH AMERICA LLC, a Delaware corporation, and CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., an Ohio corporation,
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA
Antonio Carrizosa, et al v. CQB, et al
as 13-11047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIE ESTER DURANGO HIGITA, LILIANA MARIA CARDONA, MARIA PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., an Ohio corporation, and CHIQUITA FRESH NORTH AMERICA LLC, a Delaware corporation,
Antonio Carrizosa, et al v. Chiquita Brands International,, et al
as 12-15381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA, JULIE ESTER DURANGO HIGITA, LILIANA MARIA CARDONA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
HILDA ROSA MORENO REGINO, EDILTRUDIS DEL CARME ARIZA MANCO, JHON JAIRO IBARGUEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., an Ohio corporation, and CHIQUITA FRESH NORTH AMERICA LLC, a Delaware corporation,
USA v. Douglas Pupo-Reynaldo
as 11-14666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOUGLAS PUPO-REYNALDO, a.k.a. Douglas Pupo, a.k.a. Douglas Perez, a.k.a. Reynaldo Pupo, a.k.a. Juan Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
