Cases 11 - 16 of 16
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. K&M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC.
as 3:2011cv01645
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent:
K&M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC.
Cross_claimant:
K&M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC.
Cross_defendant:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
MALONE v. LANG-SPENCER et al
as 2:2010cv06009
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCIS MARY MALONE
Defendant:
ANNETTE LANG-SPENCER, ANDREA LANG, JAMES A. LANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS et al v. K & M GENERAL CONTRACTING LLC
as 3:2009cv01630
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS, NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA, NOWAK, KLIENBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.C.
Respondent:
K & M GENERAL CONTRACTING LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. K&M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC.
as 3:2008cv01564
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
K&M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. BERNARD ASSOCIATES et al
as 2:2007cv05494
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
BERNARD ASSOCIATES, BERGEN TECHNOLOGY,INC., DORAN/TATROW ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE, VACATION, AND APPRENTICE FUNDS et al v. R & M. CONTRACTING, LLC
as 3:2007cv01921
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE, VACATION, AND APPRENTICE FUNDS and WILLIAM D CANDELORI, JR
Defendant:
R & M. CONTRACTING, LLC and K & M GENERAL CONTRACTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
