Cases 41 - 50 of 276
PRASAD v. STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE et al
as 1:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant:
STYLE WEEKLY MAGAZINE, JASON ROOP, MELISSA SCOTT SINCLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRASAD v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01130
Plaintiff:
SUNDARI KARMA PRASAD
Defendant:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., BEVERLY EVANS SMITH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAD v. LAMBERTH et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Defendant:
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARRY WEIGAN, III and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Plaintiff:
MACEO JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS KAINE, ANGELA DUNBAR, LE MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00524
Petitioner:
MACEO JONES and SALLIE JONES
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ANGELA DUNBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DENT v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00531
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, MARK S. INCH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ISAAC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
WENDELL D. ISAAC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. FULWOOD et al
as 1:2017cv02603
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRINNAGE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv02424
Petitioner:
ROBERT GRINNAGE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FOSTER v. MCNAIR et al
as 1:2017cv02372
Plaintiff:
DENISE K. FOSTER
Defendant:
RICKY MCNAIR, NIRA, ROMERO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
