Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Sivak v. Fitzgerald, et al.
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
LISA FITZGERALD, BRIDGET S. BADE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, KENNETH K. LEE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Max Royal LLC, et al v. Atieva, Inc., et al
as 23-16049
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CCIV / LUCID MOTORS SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAX ROYAL LLC, SEUNG R. LEE, HEE K. LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ATIEVA, INC., DBA Lucid Motors and PETER RAWLINSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Randy Phillips, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70031
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RANDY PHILLIPS, ROBIN SEECHARAN, PARADIGM BUSINESS PARK LLC and others
Petitioner:
RANDY PHILLIPS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Stephen Puleo et al v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv06443
Plaintiff:
Stephen Puleo, Michelle Puleo, Lee E. Hughes and others
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson, Nelson Partners, LLC, AXONIC CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wolf v. Idaho State Bd. of Corr., et al
as 20-35600
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY HRANAC, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, SUSAN WESSLESS and others
Defendant:
LEROY PENAKU
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Ou-Young v. Haag et al
as 5:2020mc80010
Defendant:
Google Inc., Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Ou-Young v. Grewal et al
as 5:2020mc80003
Defendant:
Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf, Taiwan, Republic of China and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Thomas Brissette, Sr. v. P. Finander, et al
as 19-55093
Defendant / Appellee:
D. WINSLOW, C. WU, Physician Surgeon, K. LEE and others
Defendant:
ATTY GEN J BROWN, R. COLOMBINI, STRAGA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS FLOYD BRISSETTE, Sr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
