Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Cordis Corporation v. Abbott Laboratories
as 15-1445
Defendant:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Cordis Corporation v. Lee
as 15-1371
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORDIS CORPORATION
In re: Alsabah
as 15-1264
Appellant:
In re: SHEIKHA LATEEFAH ALSABAH
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
MCM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company
as 15-1091
Appellee:
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Intervenor:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
MCM PORTFOLIO LLC
Amicus Curiae:
J. CARL COOPER
Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc.
as 15-1073
Appellee:
SSW HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Appellant:
SCHOTT GEMTRON CORPORATION
Intervenor:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Winings
as 14-1683
Appellant:
In re: CLIFFORD L. WININGS, JOSEPH B. SHUEY, TIMOTHY A. LEMKE and others
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Liu
as 14-1638
Appellant:
In re: LI LIU, STEVE YI LONG CHANG and CHENGGONG YANG
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Dominion Dealer Solutions v. Lee
as 14-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINION DEALER SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Frontline Technologies, Inc.
as 14-1473
Intervenor:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellee:
CRS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Appellant:
In re: FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
In re: Tay
as 14-1415
Appellant:
HIOK NAM TAY
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
