Cases 1 - 6 of 6
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a Hillcrest Medical Center doing business as HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH DEER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH JOHN C. LINCOLN MEDICAL CENTER doing business as SCOTTSDALE LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN HOSPITAL-NORTH MOUNTAIN doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN NORTH MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL doing business as SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BANNER HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
BANNER HEALTH doing business as BANNER-UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER TUCSON CAMPUS, BILLINGS CLINIC, CAYUGA MEDICAL CENTER AT ITHACA and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Grant Medical Center, et al v. Sylvia Burwell
as 16-5314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grant Medical Center, Riverside Methodist Hospital, Doctor's Hospital and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
GRANT MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv00480
Plaintiff:
GRANT MEDICAL CENTER , RIVERSIDE METHODIST HOSPITAL , DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Atrium Medical Center, et al v. HHS
as 13-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER, Warren, Franklin, OH, BETHESDA NORTH HOSPITAL, Cincinnati, Hamilton, OH, BROWN COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, Georgetown, Brown, OH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Atrium Medical Center et al v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Atrium Medical Center , Bethesda North Hospital , Brown County General Hospital and others
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
