Cases 1 - 10 of 2,431
Harris v. Kijakazi
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Harris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Virginia A. Regnier v. Kilolo Kajakazi
as 8:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Virginia A Regnier and Virginia A. Regnier
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael Turner v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10892
Plaintiff:
Michael Turner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Romualda Ayon v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10774
Plaintiff:
Romualda Ayon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Russell Hampton v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02612
Plaintiff:
Russell Hampton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brian Hofmann v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv02453
Plaintiff:
Brian Hofmann
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mock v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06586
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MATTHEW MOCK
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Riness v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv06544
Plaintiff:
Tazanna Ashley Riness
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fetty v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Lisha Ann Fetty
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sherman Cocroft v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv02428
Plaintiff:
Sherman Cocroft
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner, Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
