Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Raul Rodriguez v. CDCR-Agents, et al
as 20-55707
Defendant / Appellee: S. K. HEMENWAY, Appeals Examiner, individual capacity, E. MOSSER, individual; Appeals Coordinator CCII. official capacity, CDCR-AGENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Enrique Sanchez v. Kimberly Seibel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56050
Defendant: HOWARD TUNG, Surgeon at Tri-City Medical Center, in his individual capacity, J. COVARRUBIAS, Correctional Officer/Medical Transportation Team, in his/her individual and official capacities and L. ADAMS, in his/her individual and official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant: ENRIQUE SALINAS SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden and ORRY MARCIANO, Physician Assistant at CVSP, C-Yard, in his individual and official capacities
Rodney Sims v. Kimberly Seibel
as 19-55914
Petitioner / Appellant: RODNEY LOUIS SIMS
Respondent / Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Raymond Reviere v. Kimberly Seibel
as 19-55902
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND KEITH REVIERE
Respondent / Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Tony Roberts v. J. Beard, et al
as 17-56830
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONY ANTHONY ROBERTS, AKA Tony Roberts
Defendant - Appellee: J. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden and others
Joe Jones v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-17275
Petitioner - Appellant: JOE DENNIS JONES
Respondent - Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Enrique Ortega v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-56327
Petitioner - Appellant: ENRIQUE ORTEGA
Respondent - Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Ronald Willey v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-71710
Petitioner: RONALD WAYNE WILLEY
Respondent: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Raul Rodriguez v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-55768
Petitioner - Appellant: RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden
Darnell Snowden v. Kimberly Seibel
as 17-71356
Petitioner: DARNELL D. SNOWDEN
Respondent: KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?