Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Owner of Vehicle, et al.
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Johnson
Defendant:
Owner of Vehicle, Nampa Police Officers, Ronald N. Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Aldrich
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Chadwin King
Defendant:
Clinton Aldrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Dean et al
as 1:2014cv00449
Plaintiff:
James Allen Floyd
Defendant:
Dean, King and Woodcook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warden v. Cedillo et al
as 1:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Robert Levi Warden
Defendant:
Ricardo Cedillo, Chuck Hartman, Brice King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
William Gray
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Kim Spaulding, Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plant v. Burkquist et al
as 1:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Plant
Defendant:
Burkquist, Chapplin, Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. King et al
as 1:2009cv00597
Plaintiff:
Albert Ray Moore
Defendant:
Dennis F King and Butch Otter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey King
Defendant:
Smith, Christensen, Gerber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. The Governor of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
The Governor of the State of Washington, Attorney General of the State of Washington, The Legislature of the State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Fourth Judicial District, Ada County et al
as 1:2008cv00033
Petitioner:
Cody Ray King
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District, Ada County, Vaughn Killeen, Alan Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
