Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peckham v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2022cv03127
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Peckham
Defendant:
Derek Schmidt, Natasha Carter, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2019cv03053
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Tremain V. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2018cv03234
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Shawnee County et al
as 5:2018cv03212
Defendant:
Shawnee County and Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Kansas Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2018cv03197
Defendant:
Kansas Bureau of Investigation and Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Crow et al
as 5:2018cv03190
Defendant:
Sam Crow and Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Kagay et al
as 5:2018cv03192
Defendant:
Kevin Keatley, Kansas Attorney General and Mike Kagay
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Debbenham et al
as 5:2018cv03175
Defendant:
Kansas Bureau of Investigation, (fnu) Debbenham and Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulbright v. Debbenham et al
as 5:2018cv03170
Defendant:
Kansas Bureau of Investigation, (fnu) Debbenham and Kansas Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Randall Allen Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maier v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2017cv03092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Douglas County District Court, Douglas County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
