Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Jackson v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Petitioner:
Tyree Jackson
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Windsor, III v. Warden Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
William T. Windsor, III
Respondent:
Warden Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marvel v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Petitioner:
Larry D. Marvel
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cropper v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Dwayne E. Cropper
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colon v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Jose Ortez Colon, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert May and Special Assistant Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer, Sr. v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Donald Broomer, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Jerome Franks
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
