Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KAVANAGH v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 5:2014cv05571
Plaintiff: GREG KAVANAGH
Defendant: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05379
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
KAVANAGH v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66715
Plaintiff: ANDREW J. KAVANAGH
Defendant: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAVANAGH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57948
Plaintiff: HENRY KAVANAGH
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAVANAGH v. UNITED STATES LINES INC.
as 2:2010cv57563
Plaintiff: HENRY KAVANAGH
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAVANAGH v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42115
Plaintiff: HENRY KAVANAGH
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAVANAGH v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41935
Plaintiff: HENRY KAVANAGH
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAVANAGH V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35001
Plaintiff: HENRY KAVANAGH
Defendant: UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Kavanagh et al v. Crossroads Travel Center et al
as 3:2007cv02219
Plaintiff: Mildred Diane Kavanagh and Robert Kavanagh
Defendant: Crossroads Travel Center, Crossroads Travel Center, Inc. and Crossroads Travel Center, Inc. c/o James P. Ertle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KAVANAGH v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62607
Plaintiff: JOCELYN KAVANAGH
Defendant: JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE INC., DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DURABLA MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?