Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Katherine Jacob v. National General Insurance Company et al
as 8:2017cv01816
Intervenor:
Paul Hancock, Dee Lenz and Kaylani Ross
Plaintiff:
Burl Howard, Katherine Jacob and James Layne
Defendant:
National General Holdings Corp, National General Insurance Company and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Ross et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 8:2017cv01817
Petitioner:
Dee Lenz and Kaylani Ross
Respondent:
National General Holdings Corp, National General Insurance Company, Wells Fargo & Company and others
In Re Wells Fargo Collateral Protection Insurance Litigation
as 8:2017ml02797
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Auto Insurance Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Liaison Counsel for Defendants, NATIONAL GENERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Gene Conklin, Bryan Tidwell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tianna Membreno
Amicus Curiae:
Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General, State of Arizona and Attorneys General of Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska and Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ross et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as CAN/4:17-cv-04498
Plaintiff:
Kaylani Ross and Dee Lenz
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a Wells Fargo Dealer Services , National General Holdings Corp and others
Ross et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2017cv04498
Plaintiff:
Kaylani Ross and Dee Lenz
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , National General Holdings Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacob v. National General Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv05806
Plaintiff:
Katherine Jacob , Burl Howard and James Layne
Defendant:
National General Insurance Company , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and National General Holdings Corp.
Intervenor:
Kaylani Ross , Dee Lenz and Paul Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
