Cases 1 - 10 of 12
v. Pickney et al
as 1:2023cv22931
Defendant:
Patrick Pickney, Icahn Enterprises, G.P. Inc., CARL C. ICAHN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Pickney v. Icahn Enterprises, G.P. Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv22932
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pickney
Defendant:
Icahn Enterprises, G.P. Inc., CARL C. ICAHN, DAVID WILLETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Levine v. Icahn Enterprises L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv22009
Plaintiff:
Michael Levine and Colin Ochel
Defendant:
Icahn Enterprises L.P., Carl C. Icahn, David Willetts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
OKARO v. ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv21773
Plaintiff:
OSANEME OKARO
Defendant:
ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P., CARL C. ICAHN, DAVID WILLETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Yarbrough v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv09650
Defendant:
Anthony Rodio, Juliana L. Chugg, Denise Clark and others
Plaintiff:
James Yarbrough
Marathon Capital LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv08971
Defendant:
Anthony Rodio, Juliana L. Chugg, Denise Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Marathon Capital LLC
Biasi v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv08547
Defendant:
Anthony Rodio, Juliana L. Chugg, Denise Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Biasi
Gershman v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01720
Defendant:
Anthony Rodio, Colt Merger Sub, Inc., Eldorado Resorts, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gershman
ROMANIUK v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv17871
Defendant:
ANTHONY RODIO, JULIANA L. CHUGG, DENISE CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
ELDON ROMANIUK
ROMANIUK v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv17871
Defendant:
ANTHONY RODIO, JULIANA L. CHUGG, DENISE CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
ELDON ROMANIUK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
