Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CENGIZ et al v. BIN SALMAN et al
as 1:2020cv03009
Defendant:
NAIF HASSAN S. ALARIFI, ABDULAZIZ SULEIMAN AL-GUMIZI, WALEED ABDULLAH M. ALSHEHRI and others
Plaintiff:
HATICE CENGIZ and DEMOCRACY FOR THE ARAB WORLD NOW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SAFFURI v. AL ARABIYA et al
as 1:2019cv03005
Defendant:
AL ARABIYA AL HADATH, SAUDI 24 TV, OTHMAN ALI MUHAMMED OMAR and others
Plaintiff:
KHALED SAFFURI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00849
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
DEL VALLE ORTIZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv01601
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Plaintiff:
LUZ M. DEL VALLE ORTIZ and KHALED A. MOHSEN
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
