Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Kline v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cynthia Ann Allen and Coverage One Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kline v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC, Todd Gibson, Keith Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. MasTec North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
MasTec North America, Inc. and Jose R. Mas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. Chilton
as 4:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Cameron M. Chilton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. Jolayemi
as 4:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Timothy Oladele Jolayemi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WHITFIELD v. APRIA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
APRIA, INC., JOHN G FIGUEROA, MICHAEL AUDET and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Kline v. Voelker
as 4:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Robert G. Voelker
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. Nelsen
as 4:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Eric E. Nelsen
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kline v. Brandon Aumiller & Assoc. et al
as 4:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
Brandon Aumiller & Assoc. and Brandon Aumiller
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CICCOTELLI v. INTERSECT ENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INTERSECT ENT, INC., KIERAN T GALLAHUE, THOMAS A WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
