Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez Mendoza v. Acting Field Director et al
as 1:2018cv24238
Defendant:
Acting Field Director and Krome Processing Center
Plaintiff:
Jesus Enrique Rodriguez Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abdisalan Mohamed v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2016cv24437
Plaintiff:
Zakaria Abdisalan Mohamed
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , U.S. ICE Field Office Director for the Miami Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linwood v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2014cv22584
Plaintiff:
Yarou Mustafa Linwood
Defendant:
United States Attorney General , United States Department of Homeland Security , U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv20475
Petitioner:
Ian James
Respondent:
Attorney General, Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Krome Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2007cv20065
Plaintiff:
Jose Uriel Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Office of the Immigration Judge and Krome Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
