Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Caree Harper v. Otis Wright, II, et al
as 19-55915
Defendant / Appellee:
OTIS D. WRIGHT II, U.S. District Court Judge, individual and official capacities, DOES, 1-10, DAVID L. HARLOW, U.S.M.S., individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREE ANNETTE HARPER
BRITT v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02310
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. BRITT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COLEMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02187
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ABDULKADER v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02199
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MUNIR ABDULKADER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HARVEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02196
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ADRION HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CERRUTI v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02107
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CERRUTI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SNOWDEN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02010
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
FABRICE SNOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NAHOLI v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02012
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NAHOLI
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LAVICTOR v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01900
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN MICHAEL LAVICTOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AMIN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01572
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ALI SHUKRI AMIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
