Cases 1 - 5 of 5
C.L. v. David Grossman, et al
as 21-16524
Plaintiff / Appellee:
C.L., by and through his guardians ad litem Kevin and Danielle Leibel
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID GROSSMAN, Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant:
CITY OF BUCKEYE, BUCKEYE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES ARLAK, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity and others
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 21-4059
Defendant / Appellee:
R. STEVE CREAMER, an individual, JOE SMOLKA, an individual, DAVID BRADFORD, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 19-4021
Defendant:
R. STEVE CREAMER, an individual, JOE SMOLKA, an individual, CITY DEVELOPMENT, a Utah corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BRADFORD, an individual, ERIC HAWKES, an individual, FRED A. SMOLKA, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
United States ex rel. Tracy v. Emigration Improvement Dist., et al
as 19-4022
Defendant:
KENNETH WILDE, an individual, AQUA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., a Utah corporation, THE BOYER COMPANY, a Utah company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL HUGHES, an individual, AKA Michael Scott Hughes, LYNN HALES, an individual, ERIC HAWKES, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX. REL. MARK CHRISTOPHER TRACY
Undetermined:
CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C.
C.L. v. David Grossman, et al
as 19-15234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
C.L., by and through his guardians ad litem Kevin and Danielle Leibel
Defendant:
CHARLES ARLAK, Lieutenant, individually and in his official capacity, LARRY HALL, Chief, individually and in his official capacity, DOES, named as Doe BPD Officers 1 - 10, individually and in their official capacities and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID GROSSMAN, Officer, individually and in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
