Cases 1 - 10 of 26
PULOTOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv06067
Plaintiff:
NEMAT PULOTOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZAYNUTDINOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv05596
Plaintiff:
AZAMJON ZAYNUTDINOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JEH JOHNSON and LEON RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
PAYEN v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2016cv05276
Plaintiff:
VILDROPHE PIERRE PAYEN
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ZHENG v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05251
Plaintiff:
DAMI ZHENG
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
NI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv05250
Plaintiff:
WEI LE NI
Defendant:
JEH C. JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AHMEDOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv04976
Plaintiff:
ABDURASHID AHMEDOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
IVANA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv04790
Plaintiff:
ATANASHKOVA IVANA and JAMES DYLAN T.
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HAHSY v. KERRY et al
as 2:2016cv04312
Plaintiff:
SONA HAHSY
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY, MICHELE THOREN BOND, PHILLIP SLATTERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LI v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
RONG LI
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, JAMES B. COMEY, MICHAEL BORGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GUTHULA v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2016cv02544
Plaintiff:
PHANI K. GUTHULA
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and LAURA B. ZUCHOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
