Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ADVANCED DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO PERDOMO and ADVANCED DENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON and LEON RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
MISHRA v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRA
Defendant:
LEON RODRIGUEZ, JEH JOHNSON and MARK HAZUDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
LI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2016cv00952
Plaintiff:
JING JING LI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, NICHOLAS COLUCCI and LEON RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Kwok Sze v. Jeh Johnson, et al
as 16-5090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kwok Sze
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Leon Rodriguez, Director, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Felicia A. Colvin, Field Office Supervisor, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
XUEMEI v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
XUEMEI and YE XUEMEI
Defendant:
JOHNSON, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
