Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Ruderman et al v. Kenosha County et al
as 2:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Aleksey Ruderman, Arturo Saldivar and Chris Pocknell
Defendant:
Kenosha County, Kenosha County Sheriffs Department, David G Beth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1585 (human trafficking, peonage, slavery)
In re Manufactured Home Lot Rents Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023cv14565
Plaintiff:
Amber L Sailer, Colleen Levins, Dennis Keith Radogna, JR and others
Defendant:
Datacomp Appraisal Systems, Inc., Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., Hometown America Management, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Henry v. Coughlan et al
as 3:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Coughlan, Timothy C. Evans, Judge Sophia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Levin v. Q3M Insurance Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02291
Plaintiff:
Alisa Levin
Defendant:
Q3M Insurance Solutions LLC and Quantum 3 Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Maron et al v. The Law office of Ray Garcia et al
as 1:2020cv07282
Defendant:
The Law office of Ray Garcia, Ray Garcia, AE BANCORP INC and others
Plaintiff:
Bella Roiburt, Irina Maron, Michael Fridman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
USA v. Robert Levine
as 20-1929
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT M. LEVINE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tajlili v. Levine
as 1:2019cv07843
Defendant:
Nathan A Levine
Plaintiff:
Noah A Tajlili
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Desmond v. Taxi Affiliation Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08326
Plaintiff:
Michael K Desmond
Defendant:
Taxi Affiliation Services LLC, Michael Levine, Patton R Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
