Cases 51 - 60 of 1,687
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lewis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09460
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Defendant:
City of New York, City of New York Department of Correction, John and Jane Doe Correction Officers 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manchanda v. Wang et al
as 1:2023cv09403
Plaintiff:
Mr Rahul Dev Manchanda and Rahul Manchanda
Defendant:
Assistant AG Shi Shi Wang, Letitia James, Judge Erika Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 601 Title IV-A of the Social Security Act (Grants to States for Aid and Assistance to Needy Famil
Michoud v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08934
Plaintiff:
Patrice Michoud
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., Lewis Cirne, Hope Cochran and others
O'Neill v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08898
Plaintiff:
James O'Neill
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., William Staples, Lewis Cirne and others
McGhee-Lewis et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2023cv07440
Plaintiff:
Tonja McGhee-Lewis and Robert D. Lewis
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lewis v. Russell
as 6:2023cv06567
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lewis
Respondent:
Eileen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wang v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., Susan D. Arthur, Palachandra Bhat and others
O'Dell v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08507
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., Susan D. Arthur, Pali Bhat and others
Wilk et al v. Quality Installation of NY, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv06945
Plaintiff:
PATRYK WILK, PAWEL KOTWICA, PAWEL WIACEK and others
Defendant:
QUALITY INSTALLATIONS OF NY, INC.,, QUALITY INSTALLATIONS OF NEW YORK 2, INC., EAST COAST OFFICE FURNITURE INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
