Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Deloney v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Monique E. Deloney
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nadya John v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Nadya John
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Insurance Company of Boston and Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tuggle v. Cosby et al
as 1:2022cv03928
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Tuggle, III
Defendant:
Mandessa F. Cosby and Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jackson v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2022cv03485
Plaintiff:
Kowana Jackson
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nelson v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2022cv02945
Plaintiff:
Marva Nelson
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lewis v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2022cv02813
Plaintiff:
Carla Lewis
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOONE v. LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 5:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ANN BOONE
Defendant:
LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CARSWELL v. LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 5:2021cv00180
Defendant:
LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Plaintiff:
AARON D. CARSWELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Russell v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 1:2021cv00853
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Darrell Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
