Cases 1 - 10 of 15,329
Coscino v. No Cost ACA DOS, LLC
as 9:2024cv80651
Plaintiff:
Lisa Coscino
Defendant:
No Cost ACA DOS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange a/s/o Gary Lifton and Danielle Queller Lifton v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60855
Plaintiff:
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange a/s/o Gary Lifton and Danielle Queller Lifton
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC and Armstrong Relocation Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0081 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rechkunov v. DDS MAZAL, LLC
as 1:2024cv21928
Plaintiff:
Alexey Rechkunov
Defendant:
DDS MAZAL, LLC doing business as Bal Harbour Smiles
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
