Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Caine Pelzer v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-2593
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLARK, Superintendent of SCI Albion, LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent of SCI Greene, D. OVERMEYER, Superintendent of SCI Forest and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAINE PELZER
Khalil Hammond v. Robert Krak, et al
as 20-1850
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT M. KRAK, D.M.D, DORINA VARNER, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, through it's director John Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
In re: Franklin Baine
as 17-3526
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN X. BAINES
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
In re: Franklin Baine
as 16-2826
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN X. BAINES
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Nominal Respondent:
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR.
Larry Tooley v. Louis Folino, et al
as 13-3031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY TOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, LINDA B. KELLY, Attorney General, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY and others
In re: Robert L. Holbrook, et al
as 13-2644
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT L. HOLBROOK
Defendant - Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Nelson Birdwell
as 13-1794
Petitioner:
In re: NELSON BIRDWELL
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Dale Peter
as 13-1791
Petitioner:
In re: DALE R. PETERS
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Eddie Luckett, Jr.
as 13-1743
Petitioner:
In re: EDDIE L. LUCKETT, JR.
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Terry Brown
as 13-1363
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
TERRY BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and LOUIS FOLINO
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
LUIS FELIPE RESTREPO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
