Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Villa-Lojano v. Garland
as 24-1023
Petitioner:
JAIME ROLANDO VILLA-LOJANO, MARIA JESSENIA CUJI-LUCERO, ANGELES JHAYME VILLA-CUJI and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tigre Lucero v. Garland
as 24-477
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANDRES TIGRE LUCERO, PAOLA MARISOL CAJAMARCA CAJAMARCA and ASHLEY DANIELA TIGRE CAJAMARCA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lucero-Ortega v. Garland
as 24-457
Petitioner:
BLANCA AZUCENA LUCERO-ORTEGA, EDWIN PATRICIO CURRILLO-ZHICAY and JACOB STEVEN CURRILLO-LUCERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lucero-Lucero v. Garland
as 23-8092
Petitioner:
LUIS ALFREDO LUCERO-LUCERO, GLADIS PIEDAD FAREZ-ONCE, ERICK ALEXANDER LUCERO-FAREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lucero-Ortega v. Garland
as 23-8044
Petitioner:
ROSA CARMITA LUCERO-ORTEGA and MAYKEL DANIEL MARCA-LUCERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendez v. Lux Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10968
Plaintiff:
antonio lucero mendez
Defendant:
Lux Enterprises, LLC, priarity way, llc and christopher priar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lucero-Ortega v. Garland
as 23-8013
Petitioner:
ROSA CARMITA LUCERO-ORTEGA and MAYKEL DANIEL MARCA-LUCERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lucero-Rocano v. Garland
as 23-7982
Petitioner:
KARINA ALEXANDRA LUCERO-ROCANO, JHEMS ALEXANDER MOROCHO-LUCERO and KEYLA YAMILETH MOROCHO-LUCERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Varbel
as 23-7813
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY VARBEL and Marc Lucero
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Corredor v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 7:2023cv07311
Plaintiff:
Lucero M. Corredor
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
