Cases 1 - 4 of 4
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MT. LAUREL HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. LUKOIL et al
as 1:2009cv05709
Plaintiff:
MT. LAUREL HOTEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Defendant:
LUKOIL, LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, MOBIL OIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
ANIL ENTERPRISES INC. v. GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv03688
Plaintiff:
ANIL ENTERPRISES INC.
Defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. and LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
STEVE'S KEY KORNER MOBIL SERVICE STATION, INC. v. GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv02533
Plaintiff:
STEVE'S KEY KORNER MOBIL SERVICE STATION, INC.
Defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC. and LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
