Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Sivak v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2022cv00361
Plaintiff: Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant: State of Idaho, Cynthia Craig Martinez, Kristina Waldram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 22-35470
Petitioner / Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee: JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Sivak v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00309
Petitioner: Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent: Idaho Department of Corrections and Vernon Greenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sivak v. Christensen, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00514
Defendant: A DeWayne Shedd, Cynthia Martinez, Jay Christensen and others
Plaintiff: Lacey Mark Sivak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sivak v. Blades We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00189
Petitioner: Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacey Sivak v. Timothy Wilson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35877
Plaintiff - Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY D. WILSON, DAVE PASKETT and JAMES R. BARKER
Sivak v. Doe Entity
as 1:2014cv00297
Plaintiff: Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant: Unnamed Doe Entity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Idaho v. Lacey Sivak
as 13-35456
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF IDAHO
Defendant - Appellant: LACEY MARK SIVAK
State of Idaho v. Sivak
as 1:2013cv00180
Defendant: Lacey Mark Sivak
Plaintiff: State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Blades We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00600
Petitioner: Lacey Mark Sivak
Respondent: Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?