Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Kevin SouffrantIn re: Kevin Souffrant
as 24-1635
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN SOUFFRANT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Damien ClagonIn re: Damien Clagon
as 23-2461
Petitioner:
In re: DAMIEN D. CLAGON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT MORRIS HOUSER, @SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, , PA and ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carrington JosephIn re: Carrington Joseph
as 23-2108
Petitioner:
In re: CARRINGTON K. JOSEPH
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Kevin WilliamsIn re: Kevin Williams
as 23-2007
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN WILLIAMS, AKA Kirby Stewart
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Michael Myers v. , et alIn re: Michael Myers v. , et al
as 22-2373
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL MYERS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Harris County, TX, et al
as 22-3493
Petitioner:
In re: HARRIS COUNTY, TX, ROCKWALL COUNTY, TX, ELLIS COUNTY, TX and others
Not Classified By Court:
NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Respondent:
PLAINTIFFS' EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Marlon Hurdle v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-2933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON HURDLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Richard Lawrence v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 21-2781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. LAWRENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2632
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Artis Carroll, Jr.In re: Artis Carroll, Jr.
as 21-2625
Petitioner:
In re: ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Respondent:
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ET AL. LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSLYVANIA, ELAINE CHRISSOS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
