Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Sullivan v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02491
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Carol Morris, Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., The and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sullivan v. Graham et al
as 2:2022cv02319
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
John M. Graham, Jr., Melinda Young, David Clymer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Expressions Capital LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02178
Plaintiff:
Expressions Capital LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Lowe, Legacy Hutto, LLC, Legacy Venture West II, LLC and others
CVS Hutto LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02165
Plaintiff:
CVS Hutto LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Lowe, Legacy Hutto, LLC, Legacy Venture West II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
AVD Bellmont LLC v. Lowe et al
as 2:2022cv02153
Plaintiff:
AVD Bellmont LLC
Defendant:
Daniel H. Lowe, Legacy Venture West II, LLC, Venture West II, LC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
