Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Belcher v. Eaton et al
as 1:2022cv00469
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Dylan A. Eaton, Brad Little, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Church v. Wasden
as 1:2022cv00001
Petitioner:
Philip Raymond Church
Respondent:
Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, United States of America, C. L. Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Michael McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C. L. Otter, Michael McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Rich et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
Christopher Rich, Jan Bennetts, Roger Bourne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ullrich v. Otter et al
as 1:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ullrich
Defendant:
Otter, Atencio, Director Idaho Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ullrich v. Idaho Legislature et al
as 1:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ullrich
Defendant:
Idaho Legislature, Legislators, Idaho Judicial Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
