Cases 1 - 10 of 36
ACOSTA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13436
Plaintiff:
ERICA LEANNE ACOSTA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LIBERATORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14978
Plaintiff:
JULIA LEANNE LIBERATORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCGINNIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13310
Plaintiff:
LEANNE SHAWN MCGINNIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CUTLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
HEATHER LEANN CUTLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MACKEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24232
Plaintiff:
AVA LEANNE MACKEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEATHINGTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20031
Plaintiff:
LEANN WEATHINGTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SCHERER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16596
Plaintiff:
KRISTEL LEANNE SCHERER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14671
Plaintiff:
LEANNE DANIELLE BURKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEREDITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv10920
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA LEANNE MEREDITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
