Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hart v. Ly et al
as 1:2019cv01117
Defendant:
Mark Cotterell, Nguyen Ly, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pitroff et al v. Charland et al
as 1:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Mark Brighton, Joanna N. Brode, Ramona Charland and others
Defendant:
NH, State of, Portsmouth, NH, City of and USA
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Elliott, Jr. et al v. ARSTRAT Collections, LLC
as 1:2016cv00060
Defendant:
ARSTRAT Collections, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lee Elliott, Jr. and Marybeth Elliott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lee v. NH, State of
as 1:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clifford Lee
Defendant:
NH, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Blaisdell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jean Blaisdell
Defendant:
Howard Lee Schiff, P.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barba et al v. Lee et al
as 1:2012mc00044
Defendant:
BR Consulting, Inc., CGI, Inc., Dahn Yoga & Health Centers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Barba, Lily Christian, Heather Cleary and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Brian T. Lee
as 1:2012adr00008
Other:
American Bar Association, US Bankruptcy Court - NH, Clerk and US Court of Appeals-First Circuit, Clerk
Respondent:
Brian T. Lee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
